Protect our lifelines
Protect our
lifelines
- Devendra Gautam
Let’s have a look
at some of the recent decisions of the Sher Bahadur Deuba-led five-party
government.
September 08,
2022: A go-ahead for the construction of 62-km Amlekhgunj-Lothar and 50-km
Siligudi-Charali (Jhapa) pipelines. The Siligudi-Charali pipeline will be the
second Nepal-India pipeline after the 69-km Motihari-Amlekhgunj pipeline, which
is up and running.
August 18: The
Investment Board Nepal and the NHPC Limited, an Indian state-owned entity, sign
a memorandum of understanding for the development of two more export-oriented,
reservoir-based multipurpose projects -- 750-MW West Seti hydropower project
and 450-MW Seti-VI projects.
July 18, 2022:
Grandhi Mallikarjuna Rao (GMR) gets two more years from the Deuba government
for completing the financial management of a much lucrative, export-oriented
900-MW Upper Karnali Hydropower Project, virtually legitimising the Indian
company’s years-long hold onto the project.
April 08, 2022:
The government scraps the licence issued to the China Gezhouba Group
Corporation, a Chinese state-owned entity, for the development of a 1200-MW
Budhigandaki hydropower project, in an indication of further muddying of
Budhigandaki waters. Interestingly, the government has decided to develop the
national project pride on its own. However, it will be no surprise if this
scrapping is part of government efforts to literally ‘gift’ the project to a
neighbouring company that is closer to its heart.
Now, a look into
some decisions of the predecessor of the Deuba government.
In its dying
moments, the KP Sharma Oli government, much touted for its ‘patriotic’
orientation, took a major decision. That takes us to July 11, 2021. On that
day, the Investment Board Nepal (IBN) and SJVNL, an Indian
state-owned entity, signed a memorandum of understanding for the development of
a 679-MW Lower Arun hydroelectric project located in Sankhuwasabha and Bhojpur
districts. Two days later, with its last mission of the tenure accomplished
(perhaps), the Oli government would become history.
May 11, 2018:
Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi lay the
foundation stone for the export-oriented Arun III Hydropower Project (900MW),
located in Sankhuwasabha, remotely from Kathmandu.
The gifting of Nepal’s lifelines to the dear neighbour in
a very very opaque and controversial manner, despite public protests against
the sellouts, is nothing new.
It has been continuing unabetted since the handover of
the Koshi and the Gandaki after the political changes of the 1950’s that
abolished the Ranarchy and ushered the country in an era of ‘multiparty
democracy with constitutional monarchy’.
During its 30-year rule after the royal coup, the
Panchayat regime somehow managed to hold onto the Karnali and the Mahakali,
despite tremendous pressure for handover of these lifelines from New Delhi.
But right after the political changes of the 1990’s that
put an end to the Panchayat regime and restored multiparty democracy with
constitutional monarchy, the Nepali Congress-headed government gave away the
Mahakali river despite public protests, making analysts wonder if the
reluctance to gift the Mahakali proved to be the death knell for the Panchayat
regime.
In the wake of tremendous pressure from India, the United
Kingdom and the United States, the ‘sovereign Parliament’ endorsed the much
controversial Mahakali Treaty with a two-third majority through unethical
practices like horse-trading and splitting of a party, turning the legislature
into the foreign masters’ ‘rubber stamp’.
Even after the 2005’s political changes that made way for
a federal secular democratic republic of Nepal, the sellout of our lifelines
continues. In a short span of time, Nepal has lost more of her lifelines
through Upper Karnali, Arun III, Lower Arun, Arun IV, West Seti and Seti VI
deals, while governments should have focused on reclaiming Nepal’s water
sovereignty lost through above-mentioned deals, which have severely weakened
Nepal’s national sovereignty.
Worldwide, inter-state tensions over freshwater sources
are rising. The Mekong river is a case in point, so is the Nile and so is the
Brahmaputra. Just recently, Bhutan has said ‘Thanks but no thanks’ to the
Indian proposal to jointly harness the Sunkosh river, highlighting once again
that countries like Nepal should harness natural resources by taking their
national needs into account.
Worldwide, prices of oil and gas have been rising,
pushing prices of goods and services northwards and proving once again that
increasing reliance on fossil fuel will end up bleeding the world economy.
Despite this, governments of different hues and shades in
Nepal seem hell bent on selling our lifelines for a pittance and increasing the
import and consumption of oil and natural gas, whose prices have never been
stable.
The government nod for the construction of two more
pipelines comes at a time when the country is already in dire straits and dues
to the Indian Oil Corporation, the soil supplier of oil and natural gas, are
mounting and giving rise to fears that mounting fuel bill may become the
ultimate debt trap for Nepal.
Who will rein in on our governments? Who will save Nepal
from a looming debt trap?
It is a given that student unions will not hit the
streets against anti-Nepal moves like these and compel the government of the
day to do a rethink as they have to do the bidding of their political masters.
‘Public intellectuals’ may not voice their concerns about matters like these
for reasons best known to them.
The House is a rubber stamp, always at the service of a
majority, manufactured or gotten through a popular mandate.
The judiciary is on deathbed, so expecting it to do
something about the matter will be far-fetched. Many mass media outlets have
vested interests to serve.
That leaves us with the Presidential Palace.
Can a hard-pressed Sheetal Niwas do something about it
and save us all from a looming debt trap?
Comments
Post a Comment