Nepal needs a strategy for survival
Is the period of Long Peace, marked by the absence of major wars between great powers since the end of World War II (1945), coming to an end?
What do the latest developments in Venezuela,
Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Palestine, Iran, Greenland and our very own backyard—you
see, having subcontinent-size countries as neighbours has its unique
advantages—indicate?
What factors/developments are giving rise to
yet another crisis in a world where humans across generations have spent most
of their times fighting or fleeing to save their dear lives along with that of
their near and dear ones, with data suggesting that only eight percent of our
recorded history—around 268 out of 3,400 years) has been truly peaceful?
Now, let’s have a look at factors contributing
to the Long Peace. They are: nuclear deterrence, economic interdependence
through trade, the spread of democracy, the United Nations’ role, increased
human rights/education, stable borders and shifting cultural norms that value
life, bipolarity and capitalist peace.
How about defining some of the key factors
whose meanings are less obvious?
Nuclear deterrence: The Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs defines it as a principle in international relations where the retaliatory potential and destructive force of nuclear weapons prevents nations from launching a nuclear attack. However, there are questions as to
whether nuclear deterrence is sufficient, effective, just, or ethical.
Bipolarity: It is the global system
with two nuclear-powered superpowers at the helm, like the United States and
the then USSR during the Cold War (1945-89). While the US led the North
Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), the USSR led the Warsaw Pact, presiding
over a tenuous peace the world over. With the disintegration of the USSR on
December 26, 1991, the division
of the world into two rival blocs ended, giving the US considerable leeway for the expansion
of NATO into Russia’s neighbourhood with the inclusion of reunified Germany,
Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Albania, Croatia, Montenegro and North Macedonia from 1990 till 2020, stalling
the plan to bring Ukraine onboard.
Capitalist peace: This
concept holds that free markets, trade and economic interdependence nurture
peace between countries by increasing the costs of war, promoting mutual
interests and incentivising cooperation over conflict, making capitalist
countries less likely to fight each other. Key mechanisms for capitalist peace
are the high opportunity cost of disrupting mutually profitable trade, trust
built through contractual relations and reduced incentives for conquest when
wealth comes from innovation and exchange, and not through the capture of
territories.
Meanwhile in the United States, which remains as the sole
superpower presiding over a rules-based international order on the decline amid
the rise of a multipolar world order, 45 individuals have
served 47 presidencies spanning 60 four-year terms since April 30,
1789.
On September 5, 2025, Donald J Trump, the 47th
president, signed an executive order changing the
Department of Defense's name to the Department of War as a “secondary
title”.
The 200th presidential order of Trump
authorizes Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DoD subordinate officials to use
secondary titles like "Department of War," "Secretary of
War" and "Deputy Secretary of War" in public communications,
official correspondence, ceremonial contexts and non-statutory documents within
the executive branch, according to a fact sheet from the White House.
Additionally, the order directs all executive
agencies and departments to "recognize and accommodate these secondary
titles in internal and external communications," as well as instructing
Hegseth to recommend actions — including executive and legislative actions — that
would be required to permanently rename the department.
Amid the rise of our giant neighbours along
with Russia and their increasing presence in the immediate neighbourhood and
much beyond, including in Latin America, Thucydides,
considered the father of the school of political realism, seems to be proving
from his grave the relevance of his ‘trap’ even in this day and age.
Indeed, the Thucydides’ Trap refers to the
natural, inevitable discombobulation that occurs when a rising power threatens
to displace a ruling power and when a rising power threatens to displace a
ruling power, the resulting structural stress makes a violent clash the rule,
not the exception.
How will a fragile and strategically-located
country, which almost collapsed within 48 hours of a youths-led protest, be
able to defend herself and protect her core interests as powers worth their
names fight viciously for dominance in her backyard and beyond?
Will weak and famished cats spread in the
immediate neighbourhood and beyond be able to survive by standing together
against their far mightier species on the prowl even as the peacemaker cat
continues to mew from the banks of the Hudson, albeit feebly?
It’s time for
national forces like the leaders of political parties making a beeline for
talks at a foreign capital, the deposed monarch, government ministers, experts,
bureaucrats and exceptionally competent generals of Bhadrakali, who know
geopolitics like the back of their hands as their nuggets of wisdom spread
through YouTube and other forums suggest, to come together and devise a
strategy for survival.


Comments
Post a Comment